HMGA Water Project
  • Home
  • Project Overview
    • Project Description
    • Project Team
    • Collaborative Projects
    • FAQ
  • Publications
    • Blog
    • Factsheets
    • News Articles
  • Events
  • Gallery
  • Dedirting
  • Contact

Electrocoagulation

9/22/2016

0 Comments

 
Some solids are too small to be captured by solid removal techniques. They need to be compounded together in order to make them large enough to be efficiently separated from water. This process is referred to as coagulation and flocculation.

​Electrocoagulation is a method of coagulation and flocculation which applies an electrical charge to make the particles come together by changing the charge on the particles’ surfaces. The wastewater is held in an area where an electrical field is created using charged metal surfaces called anodes and cathodes. Applying the charge to the water destabilizes the bonds holding compounds such as solids and nutrients to water molecules. It will also strip the charge from colloids. These destabilized particles now come together to form a mass. This process will create a stable floc of particles that rises to the surface, a sludge layer on the bottom, and clarified water in the middle. The waste can be removed by skimming from the surface and collecting from the bottom; it can then be dewatered and composted. The clarified water is removed from the center and brought to its next destination.

The alternative to electrocoagulation is using chemicals to coagulate and flocculate. The advantage of electrocoagulation is the waste stream is free of any added compounds. Chemical dosing systems are also greatly dependent on the pH, composition of the water to be treated, and the flow rate. The dose may need to change regularly in response to these factors in order to be fully effective. The disadvantage of electrocoagulation is that it is reliant on a sufficient electrical supply and will require a sludge de-watering system. Both versions of coagulation require on-going inputs, whether be chemicals or electricity.
An electrocoagulation system will require a sufficient and approved electrical supply (a dedicated breaker is suggested), holding tanks, and a waste removal system. The unit itself may be small, but the supporting equipment may require a substantial indoor footprint. It is highly recommended to use a computer system to operate the equipment and install holding tanks to moderate water flow to a consistent rate. On-going inputs will include electricity, sacrificial anode replacements, waste handling, and maintenance.
Videos on Electrocoagulation
​

The video links listed below are for information only. The companies are not being endorsed by the HMGA Water Project.
  • Electrocoagulation 101
  • ​H2O Technologies, Inc. "Electro coagulation Process Video"
  • ​KASELCO Sur-Flo Electrocoagulation Treatment
0 Comments

Lesson Learned: Technology Selection

7/11/2016

1 Comment

 
​Problem: A greenhouse facility wants to reuse water from a flood floor which is used to water potted plants. The water collected has vermiculite and organic matter clouding the water which would clog nozzles and settle in pipes.
 
Solution: The operator looked at two different technologies, a self-indexing filter and a parabolic filter screen (Figures 1 & 2). Both are recommended units that filter coarse material from water.
Picture
Figure 1: Diagram of a self-indexing filter [level sensor is tripped when water rises due to clogged paper and roll is unspooled]
Picture
Figure 2: Diagram of a parabolic filter screen [(a) inflow; (b) flows onto screen; (c) waste remains on screen and treated water falls through; (d) waste exits through tray; (e) treated water exits through (f); (g) water overflows if screen becomes clogged and exits through (f)]
​Discussion: The infrastructure required for either technology is similar; both will need some plumbing and a pump to move water through the treatment system. The technologies are compared in the table below. Both systems will complete the task; the self-indexing filter is more hands-off but requires more inputs. The parabolic filter screen must be supervised but has minimal on-going costs.
Picture
​Decision: The operator choses the self-indexing filter as it requires less regular supervision. The additional energy costs, on-going need of paper rolls, and disposal of paper was preferable to increased labour requirements and disposal of waste.
 
Lesson Learned: When there are multiple technologies that could fit in a treatment system it is important to investigate all aspects. Decisions should be made based on more factors than merely cost.
1 Comment

Self-Indexing Filter

6/6/2016

0 Comments

 
A self-indexing filter is a system that uses filter paper to remove solids from water. The unit works by feeding a filter paper media off a roll and laying it on a mesh support that forms a trough. Water is either gravity-fed or pumped through an inlet where it is distributed across the width of the roll so that it is evenly released onto the paper. The water flows down the paper and settles into the base of the trough where the solids in the water are captured by the filter and the water falls through into a collection tray. The solids will eventually clog the filter media and cause the water level to rise. Once a pre-set level sensor is reached, the media will be ‘indexed’; new paper will be fed off the roll to replace the clogged media in the trough. The removed solids are trapped within and on the filter media and will stay with it as it is rolled out of the unit. The paper and solids will then dry and can be disposed.
Picture
Figure 1: Components of and incoming and treated water flows through a self-indexing filter
There are advantages and disadvantages to this system. The amount of paper necessary will depend on the amount of solids in the water; more solids will mean more paper being used. The paper traps the solids and both can be disposed of together. It is automated equipment and can be run with minimal operator input. The pore size of the media can range in size from less than 10 microns to 200 microns so it can be customized to a facility’s needs. This system is a proven technology and available from multiple suppliers.
​

References
  • Clearstream Filters Inc. (2009). Operation Manual Myco Self Indexing Unit. In Myco Media Filter. Retrieved April 29, 2016, from http://www.clearstream.ca/mmfmanual.pdf
  • Water Maze. (2016). Mechanical Filtration. In Wastewater Technology. Retrieved April 29, 2016, from http://www.wmaze.com/wastewater-technology.aspx
0 Comments

News Release: "Technology Investigation: Coagulation & Flocculation"

5/3/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
The HMGA Water Project evaluated coagulation and flocculation systems for removing fine solids from washwater. They were used in conjunction with large solid removal technologies and compared to other systems with no added chemicals. A summary of the tests and results are available in the article below.
Technology Investigation: Coagulation & Flocculation
File Size: 520 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

0 Comments

Factsheet Reading Order

4/11/2016

29 Comments

 
This project has produced an array of factsheets on a range of topics. Below is the list grouped into topics and arranged in a suggested reading order. The documents can be found here, unless otherwise noted.
 
Water Qualities
#012 Water Quality Standards in Agriculture
#001 Water Quality Parameters for Vegetable Washwaters
 
Regulatory Considerations
#004 Considerations when Determining Discharge Limits
#018 Selecting a Laboratory
#006 Water Sampling & Proper Procedures
#009 Regulatory Permitting & Compliance
 
Technology Considerations
#016 Design Considerations for Vegetable Washwater Treatment Systems
#007 Choosing Washwater or Water Treatment Technologies
#002 Impact of Muck Soils on Water Treatment Systems
 
Large Solid Removal
#014 Large Solid Removal for Effective Treatment
Technology Investigation: Filter Bags (available here)
#005 Settling Ponds & Tanks
#008 Drum Filters
#010 Hydrocyclones & Centrifuges
 
Small Solid and Nutrient Removal
#003 Coagulation & Flocculation
#013 Biofiltration
Technology Investigation: Ultrafiltration & Capacitive Deionization (available here)

Polishing and Dosing
#011 Bottom Aeration
#017 Surface Aeration
#015 Water Treatment Technology Options for Washing Vegetables
29 Comments

Clarifying the Solid Removal Process

3/28/2016

4 Comments

 
Picture
Figure 1: Examples of creaming in settling tanks
When working with small particle removal, experience has shown that the addition of chemical coagulants or flocculants is usually a necessity. The question is what is the best method of applying this system?

First, all the applicable terms need to be defined:
  1. Clarification: this term can be used to describe the overall process of removing fine particles from water
  2. Coagulation: is the act of neutralizing the charges of particles that allow them to repel each other.
  3. Flocculation: occurs when neutralized (coagulated) particles are brought together to form larger compounds called ‘flocs’
  4. Sedimentation: separating solids from water through settling
  5. Creaming/Flotation: separating solids from water by floating them to the surface
  6. Dewatering: separating solids from water through filtration

The first stage in the clarification of water is coagulation. When small particles are involved, coagulation usually has to be achieved through the addition of chemical aids. The next stage is flocculation and whether or not another chemical is required here is dependent on the particles and the desired speed of floc formation. The final stage is separating the flocs from the water.
Picture
Figure 2: Coagulation, flocculation, creaming, sedimentation, and dewatering
Floc separation can occur three different ways: sedimentation, creaming, or dewatering. The method chosen will depend on the type of flocs as some will naturally sink and others will prefer to float. It is important to match the coagulant and flocculant chemicals, floc behaviour, and method of separation to make a clarification system operate properly and efficiently.
Each separation method has its own challenges including infrastructure needs. Sedimentation is most commonly completed using a settling tank. The separated solids will need to be scooped out regularly so the tank has sufficient room to collect solids. Creaming is associated with air flotation where solids either naturally float or are aided with dissolved air carrying solids upwards. The solids are then skimmed off the water surface. Dewatering uses filters to collect the solids behind a membrane. The membrane will require regular cleaning or replacement when the solids clog the pores. Water used to clean the membranes will also need to be considered for further treatment.
References
  • Tramfloc, Inc. (2014). Selecting Polymers, Jar Testing Procedures. In Flocculants. Retrieved March 14, 2016, from http://tramfloc.com/polymers-selection-jar-testing-procedures/
  • GE Power & Water. (2012). Chapter 05 - Clarification. In Handbook of Industrial Water Treatment. Retrieved March 14, 2016, from http://www.gewater.com/handbook/ext_treatment/ch_5_clarification.jsp
4 Comments

Dissolved Air Flotation

3/14/2016

1 Comment

 
Dissolved Air Flotation, referred to by its acronym of DAF, is a method of removing contaminants from wastewater that have a tendency to float, such as fine solids. Pressurized air is injected into a water stream which is commonly sourced from post-treatment clarified water. That water is mixed with the incoming untreated water where the dissolved air is no longer pressurized and comes out of the solution in tiny bubble form. These bubbles attach to the contaminants and together they rise to the surface. The contaminants can then be skimmed off and disposed. Clarified water exits through the bottom of the tank to ensure the floating contaminants do not continue past the unit.
Picture
Figure 1: Diagram of a DAF unit (Komline-Sanderson, 2015)
The solids to be removed may be too fine to be caught by the rising bubbles. In these cases, coagulants and/or flocculants are used to aggregate them into larger clusters. The coagulants and flocculants are added either in a preceding tank or piping system.
​
DAF systems will have a smaller footprint than a settling system as there is more active movement in a DAF system. It is an indoor system as it should not freeze. The timing of any chemical additions for aggregation of soils must be carefully considered as it will take time to properly bind the solids. If they are added too close to the DAF, full flocculation will not occur and that chemical will be wasted.

​References
  • Mundi, G. S. (2013). Assessment of Effective Solids Removal Technologies to Determine Potential for Vegetable Washwater Reuse (Master's thesis). NovemberRetrieved from https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10214/7737/Mundi_Gurvinder_201312_Msc.pdf?sequence=3
  • Komline-Sanderson. (2015). Applications. In Dissolved air flotation. Retrieved December 14, 2015, from http://www.komline.com/images/tab_DAF_app.png
1 Comment

Progressive Passive Filtration

2/29/2016

0 Comments

 
A progressive passive filter is simply a series of screens with increasingly smaller openings that trap solids as the water flows through the unit (Figure 1). It is designed to be a gravity-fed process and is best suited for low volume flows. The screens are installed on an angle and the water level gradually climbs as the screen becomes clogged. If the screen becomes fully clogged, the washwater can overflow into the next area. The filter can be easily cleaned by removing the screens and washing off the solids. Depending on the settling capability of the solids begin filtered, the tank holding the screens may also need to be rinsed.
This system is intended for low volume washing facilities with low solid loads. It will easily handle inconsistent flows as long as the flows don’t overwhelm the filters; it should be sized for the maximum flow or the flow be restricted to the filter’s capability. The number and sizes of the filters are chosen based on the type of solids to be removed. The final filter should be 100 microns as solids that pass through will not settle in pipes and block water flow.
Picture
Figure 1: Diagram of a progressive passive filter
The advantage of this type of system is that it is a compilation of parts that can be inexpensively sourced. It can be built to any size necessary and be fitted into an existing tank system. The disadvantage is that it is not useful in a large-scale production and it does require manual operation and maintenance.
Picture
Figure 2: Side view (far left), top view (center left), inside view (center right), and the outlet and 100 micron screen (far right) of the progressive passive filter constructed based on the diagram of Figure 1.
0 Comments

Drum Filter Demonstration Site

6/8/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
Figure 1: Components of a drum filter
A drum filter was placed at a washing facility to test its performance. Drum filters function by allowing washwater to fall through a circular metal screen. As the screen becomes plugged by solids, the water level rises until it trips a sensor. This signals the machine to rotate the drum and turn on a spray bar which cleans the waste off the screen into a collection tray that exits through an outlet. The water used to rinse is pumped out of the lower portion where filtered water is collected prior to flowing out. It can also be programmed to rotate and rinse on a set schedule.
Picture
Figure 2: Solids trapped by the screen (left), spraying the screen clean (middle), and the inflow, left, and outflow, right, from the drum filter (right)
The filter tested is rated to handle 1,000 US gallons/minute with a solid load of 10 mg/L using a 30 micron screen. However, the washwater it was treating had a lower flow rate and a higher solid load. It was installed after a barrel washer for root vegetables and before a biofiltration system intended for dissolved solids and nutrients. Theoretically this drum filter would remove suspended solids larger than 30 microns in size, leaving the finer solids and dissolved portion for the next treatment step. 
Drum filters are able to remove large amounts of solids from a washwater and concentrate it into the waste stream (Figure 3). The outflow can then continue to further treatment processes to remove finer solids which cannot be caught by the screen. The waste stream, however, would also require further work. The goal is to concentrate the waste to the point where it is the consistency of sludge with minimal water and maximum solids. It is then disposed of, for example, through composting.

This filter required optimization to produce a sludge-like waste and that process will be more thoroughly explained in an upcoming article.
Picture
Figure 3: From left to right, samples of inflow, waste stream, and outflow
0 Comments

News Release: "Technology Investigation: Filter Bags"

5/11/2015

1 Comment

 
Picture
HMGA Water Project recently collaborated with Bishop Water Technologies to test a Geotube® at a vegetable washing facility. The purpose of the pilot project was to demonstrate the feasibility of this technology under this type of system. The process leading up to the on-site test and the results found are available in the article below.
Technology Investigation: Filter Bags
File Size: 603 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

1 Comment
<<Previous

    Project Updates

    Find articles on project-related topics here

    Archives

    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014

    Topics

    All
    Aerators
    Coagulation & Flocculation
    Deionization
    Discharge Characterization
    Drum Filter
    Filter Bags
    General Information
    Hydrocyclone
    Lake Simcoe
    Lesson Learned
    Muck
    Nottawasaga Valley
    Pre Treatment
    Pre-Treatment
    Sampling
    Settling Ponds/Tanks
    South-Eastern Georgian Bay
    System Evaluation
    Treatment Technologies
    Ultrafiltration
    Washing Process
    Water Quality Parameters
    Watershed

    RSS Feed

    Article Titles

    Introduction to
      Watersheds

    Lake Simcoe Watershed
    Nottawasaga Valley
      Watershed
    South-Eastern Georgian
      Bay Watershed
    Water, Water,
      Everywhere?
    The Trouble with Muck:
      Size
    Lesson Learned: Bottom-
      up Aerator to Treat
      Washwater in Settling
      Tanks
    Phosphorus, the
      Environment, and
      Farming
    Nitrogen’s Impact on Air,
      Land, and Water
    Water-borne Pathogens
      and Food Safety
    Defining Dissolved
      Oxygen
    Filter Bags
      Demonstration Site
    Organic Matter
      Breakdown &
      Biochemical Oxygen
      Demand
    Dealing with Cloudy
      Water
    Hydrocyclone
      Demonstration Test
    What IS Muck?
    Demystifying Oxidation-
      Reduction Potential
    News Release
      "Technology
      Investigation: Filter
      Bags"
    Drum Filter
      Demonstration Site
    Decomposing With(out)
      Oxygen
    Flow monitoring
    Lesson Learned: Drum
      Filter Optimization
    Polders & the Holland
      Marsh
    Vegetable Washing
      Process
    ​Dry Soil Removal
    Ultrafiltration &
      Deionization
      Demonstration Site
    News Release
      "Technology
      Investigation:
      Ultrafiltration &
      Capacitive Deionization"
    Progressive Passive
      Filtration
    ​Dissolved Air Flotation
    Clarifying the Solid
      Removal Process
    Factsheet Reading Order
    News Release:
      "Technology
      Investigation:
      Coagulation &
      Flocculation"
    Self-Indexing Filter
    Monitoring Discharge
    ​  Flows
    Settling Soil
    Mass Loading
      Calculations
    Lesson Learned:
      Technology Selection
    Electrocoagulation
    Auto-Samplers
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.